Mandating hpv vaccination arguments

By combining vaccination with routine Pap smear screening, these public health efforts have the remarkable opportunity to eradicate cervical cancer (Ramet et al., 2011).Another reason HPV vaccination should be mandatory is because health disparities could become even greater if this vaccination is not mandated.What other additional clinical and behavioral research does the scientific community require to make a sound evidence-based decision about potential vaccine risk?Furthermore, clinical trials with new vaccines are being conducted presently that protect against more HPV types as well as with those that potentially could prevent cervical cancer in women who are already infected with the virus.Proposals for routine and mandatory HPV vaccination of girls have become sources of controversy for parents of school-aged youth, legislators, members of the medical community, and the public at large (Cooper et al. Evidence Based Arguments against Mandatory HPV Vaccination Childhood immunizations, such as measles, chicken pox, and polio, are mandatory for school-aged youth and Emotional Based Arguments against Mandatory HPV Vaccination The HPV vaccine is designed to prevent infection by the strains of the virus that are responsible for the majority of cervical cancer and genital warts cases.Public Health is trying to make this vaccination mandatory for all young females. Public Health does not care about individuals but about the group or the population.An example of this is a 16-year-old girl who lost nearly all of her vision within 10 days of receiving the second course of her vaccine against the human papilloma virus, reports a case study in the Journal of Child Neurology.The study recounts the case of a previously healthy teenage girl who developed a headache on the left side of her head and began to lose vision in her right eye eight days after receiving her second HPV vaccine shot.

Nationally and internationally, the HPV vaccine will significantly reduce disease burden by reducing monetary and psychological costs of invasive procedures that remove precancerous and cancerous lesions.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the most common sexually transmitted illness in the United States (Saslow et al., 2007).

Currently, one vaccine, Gardasil (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ), prevents four subtypes of the HPV virus, ultimately protecting women against the major cause of cervical cancer.

version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Mandating HPV vaccination: what are the arguments?

&title=Journal of Christian Nursing &volume=25&issue=2&date=2008-04&au=Smith, Christy M.

Search for mandating hpv vaccination arguments:

mandating hpv vaccination arguments-62mandating hpv vaccination arguments-14mandating hpv vaccination arguments-81

A vaccine was approved in 2006 that is effective in preventing the types of HPV responsible for 70% of cervical cancers and 90% of genital warts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “mandating hpv vaccination arguments”